Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Thursday, September 24, 2015

Reframing Microlensing: Blog 11, Worksheet 4.1, Problem 3

When speaking about microlensing, it is often easier to refer to angular quantities in units of θE. Let’s define u = β/θE and y = θ/θE.

Show that the lens equation can be written as: u=yy1
A)  Since we know ΘE=(4GMLπrelc2)12 and β=ΘE4GMLπrelΘc2 we can find u=βΘE=ΘE4GMLπrelΘc2(4GMLπrelc2)12 And y=ΘΘE=Θ(4GMLπrelc2)12 Rearranging that gives: u=ΘΘEΘ2EΘΘE=ΘΘEΘEΘ=yy1  u=yy1

Solve for the roots of y(u) in terms of u. These equations prescribe the angular position of the images as a function of the (mis)alignment between the source and lens. For the situation given in Question 2(f) and a lens-source angular separation of 100 µas (micro-arcseconds), indicate the positions of the images in a drawing.
B)  u=yy1 Multiplying everything by y gives:  yu=y21 y2uy1=0 Plugging this into a quadratic equation gives: y=u±u2+42 The fact that we have two possible answers is consitent with the two images often seen in gravitational lensing.

In the case of 2(f), we already have β and ΘE so we can rearrange the equation to get:  ΘΘE=βΘE±(βΘE)2+42  Θ1×106=1×1041×106±(1×1041×106)2+42 ΘE=104,1010arcseconds This would look something like this, though this is extremely exaggerated:


1 comment:

  1. Good job Danielle! Your Einstein radius is much smaller than mine, so I have very different numbers than you...You may want to check your algebra! Otherwise, your logic is great! 5/5

    ReplyDelete