When speaking about microlensing, it is often easier to refer to angular quantities in units of θE.
Let’s define u = β/θE and y = θ/θE.
Show that the lens equation can be written as: u=y−y−1
A) Since we know ΘE=(4GMLπrelc2)12 and β=ΘE−4GMLπrelΘc2 we can find u=βΘE=ΘE−4GMLπrelΘc2(4GMLπrelc2)12 And y=ΘΘE=Θ(4GMLπrelc2)12 Rearranging that gives: u=ΘΘE−Θ2EΘΘE=ΘΘE−ΘEΘ=y−y−1 u=y−y−1
Solve for the roots of y(u) in terms of u. These equations prescribe the angular position of the
images as a function of the (mis)alignment between the source and lens. For the situation given
in Question 2(f) and a lens-source angular separation of 100 µas (micro-arcseconds), indicate
the positions of the images in a drawing.
B) u=y−y−1 Multiplying everything by y gives: yu=y2−1 y2−uy−1=0 Plugging this into a quadratic equation gives: y=u±√u2+42 The fact that we have two possible answers is consitent with the two images often seen in gravitational lensing.
In the case of 2(f), we already have β and ΘE so we can rearrange the equation to get: ΘΘE=βΘE±√(βΘE)2+42 Θ1×10−6=1×10−41×10−6±√(1×10−41×10−6)2+42 ΘE=10−4,−10−10arcseconds This would look something like this, though this is extremely exaggerated:
Good job Danielle! Your Einstein radius is much smaller than mine, so I have very different numbers than you...You may want to check your algebra! Otherwise, your logic is great! 5/5
ReplyDelete