- A white dwarf can be considered a gravitationally bound system of massive particles.
-
(a) Express the kinetic energy of a particle of mass m in terms of its momentum p instead of the
usual notation using its speed v.
- 12mv2=p22m
-
(b) What is the relationship between the total kinetic energy of the electrons that are supplying
the pressure in a white dwarf, and the total gravitational energy of the WD?
- We know K=−12U and U=GM2r and K=p22me Combining these gives: GM2r=p2N2me Where N=M⋆mp+me=M⋆mp(1+memp)≈M⋆mp So \[ GM2r=p2M⋆2memp
-
(c) According to the Heisenberg uncertainty Principle, one cannot know both the momentum and
position of an election such that ∆p∆x > h4π . Use this to express the relationship between the 4π kinetic energy of electrons and their number density ne (Hint: what is the relationship between an object’s kinetic energy and its momentum? From here, assume p = ∆p and then use the Uncertainty Principle to relate momentum to the volume occupied by an electron assuming Volume ~ (∆x)3.) V∼x3∼n−1e px=h4π p=h4πx=hn13e4π For 1 electron K=p22me=hn23e32π2me For many K=h2n23e32π2me⋅Mmp
- (d) Substitute back into your Virial energy statement. What is the relationship between ne and the mass M and radius R of a WD? K=−12U h2n23e32π2Me⋅Mmp=GM22r 16MR=h2n23eπ2memp
- (e) Now, aggressively yet carefully drop constants, and relate the mass and radius of a WD. h23=MR Where n=mV=m43πR3 (MR)23=MR R=1M13
-
(f) What would happen to the radius of a white dwarf if you add mass to it?
- The relationship is inverted, so it would decrease.
UPDATE: I know my latex is not compiling in some places; I have no idea why. No matter how many different ways I type it, it won't compile (but just for some?). Do you have any suggestions? -
(a) Express the kinetic energy of a particle of mass m in terms of its momentum p instead of the
I worked with Barra, April, and Sean on this problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment